England and Ireland Essay Example

England and Ireland Essay To understand this current situation, we will have to go back in history. There are three critical dates which lead to the situation today. Those dates are: 1170, 1609, and 1969. In the next paragraphs I will briefly explain what was going on in each of these years. To begin with, in 1170, Henry II ruled England. He attempted to attach Ireland to his kingdom. However, he only established control in a small area near Dublin known as the Pale. In that particular area, English citizens started moving in and adapting the English language, religion, practices, beliefs, and etc. Attempts were made to conquer the rest of Ireland, but major English expansion did not take place until the seventeenth century. In 1609, Queen Elizabeths army had established the English rule over most of the island of Ireland, with the exception of the Northern Province: Ulster. The Ulster clans (Lead by Hugh ONeil) had a very affective alliance against the English army. Unfortunately, after a long and damaging c ampaign, it was eventually brought under English control in 1703. By then, all the Irish leaders had left Ireland for Europe, and less than 5% of Ulster was controlled by Catholics Irish. Later on, in 1969, the restlessness in Northern Ireland really started. In this year, the minority demanded better job opportunities, accommodation, and rights for voting.In reaction to this, the British government introduced a new law which prohibited religious discrimination and cancelled the law of 1922. In reaction to that, in the 1970s, the IRA (Irish Republic Army) began their terrorist reactions. The problems in Northern Ireland are practically from the difference in religion. There are two main camps, the Unionists and the Republicans. The Unionists are Protestant Christians, and the Republicans are Catholic Christians. Northern Ireland was created by the English as an attempt to stop the fighting. The idea was that as the Protestants

the shephard essays

the shephard essays Throughout time there has been at least one constant that I am aware of. That constant is art. One particular piece of art stands out and catches the eye. That piece of art is The Shepherdess and Her Flock constructed and perfected by Jean Francois Millet. When one makes a certain judgment on a piece of art, one must be precise and certain about that judgment. When observing Millets piece I will take in to consideration three things to make my judgment: use of color, theme, and meaning. The Shepherdess and Her Flock catches the eye very quickly. The painting consists of a shepherdess tending to her sheep in some remote hills perhaps and most likely in Western Europe. The shepherdess herself is standing just a few paces ahead of her flock while they are all grouped together tightly apparently feeding. She is holding a staff while studying the ground. The look on her face makes her seem like she is disturbed for some unknown reason. The shepherdess is wearing many articles of clothing. Her first layer is blue and reaches down to her ankles. The next layer appears to be some kind of shawl. The shawl is cream colored and only reaches just past her waist. The final piece of clothing is red and only covers her head. The grass beneath the shepherdess, which covers the entire land, has bald spots and contains dandy lions giving it great character. This is the grass on which the flock is feeding on. Watching over the sheep is a shepherd dog stand just to the rig ht of the flock. The dog stands very proudly and has a great pride in his job. The sky in this work is covered entirely with clouds. The only bare spot in the sky is at the very top of the painting where the clouds begin to split. Millets work appears to be set early in the morning. Looking beyond the flock as far as the painting will allow, one can see some hills and trees and perhaps a small village or town. This p ...

Who Cares about Corruption Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Who Cares about Corruption - Essay Example Many businessmen, like Pavlo Zhuk, have to choose between their personal ethics and business rules of their countries and the local rules of a foreign country.   In many countries, like Ukraine, if markets are not to deal with the allocation of people to jobs and of outputs to consumers, then some centralized coercive power is necessary to do the same thing1. Such power creates incen ­tives for bribery, corruption and allocation ac ­cording to the tastes of the central admini ­strators2. If at the going prices and wages, there are not enough flats or plum jobs to go around, the local bureaucrat will often allocate some to those who pay the largest bribe, some to those with religious beliefs, hairstyles or political views that he likes, and only the rest to those whose names come up on the waiting list. During the final quarter of this century, increasing attention has been given to ethics concerns3. If Zhuk refuses to pay-off the tax officials, his friends and employees will lose their jobs and substantial sources of income. Taking into account facts and statistical results of the Third World countries, it is evident that Zhuk shoul d pay off the tax officials to save his business in Ukraine.   Corruption of officials is of concern to many throughout the world. Corruption can affect the international marketer in many ways, both positive and negative. Following Cuervo-Cazurra (1996): â€Å"the official has an incentive to ask for a bribe to increase his or her income in exchange for a good that has little cost to him or her†4. Countries are using many measures to fight corruption with the intent of control, reduction, and ultimately elimination.